"The e-mail string posted by YamaTough was actually between them and... law enforcement. YamaTough actually reached out to us, first, saying that if we provided them with money, they would not post any more source code. At that point... it was a clear cut case of extortion..."
* * *
Anonymous-aligned hacker YamaTough, the spokesperson for the hacktivist group “The Lords of Dharmaraja”, falsely accused Symantec of attempting to bribe the group in order to prevent the release of source code for the company's PCanywhere product, among others.
Looking through the email exchange posted on Pastebin alleged to have taken place between YamaTough and a representative from Symantec, it appears that the attempt to reach an arrangement was nothing more than an exercise in good business practices on the part of the software giant at best - and perhaps an extortion operation on the part of the hackers at worst.
It is hard to characterize Symantec's efforts to prevent the release of proprietary information in an illegal data dump as being anything approaching unsavory.
In a series of tweets, YamaTough said "Sorry everybody for being silent that much. You won't believe it but Symantec offered us money to keep quiet... And quess what they couldn't make it over 50k for the whole range of their src sh*t, therefore the show starts as of tuday... they've been tricked trolled into offering a bribe so the false statement be made we never had the code and lied..."
The assertion that Symantec wanted the hackers to "lie" is not clear in the exchange at all. It looks to be that Symantec is maintaining that the source code was stolen in 2006, and that the demand placed on the hacker group was to admit they had lied about obtaining the code from a breached Indian government server, as the the hackers had originally claimed.
The particular statement attributed to Symantec in the Pastbin posting is as follows:
"We can't pay you $50,000 at once for the reasons we discussed previously. We can pay you $2,500 per month for the first three months. In exchange, you will make a public statement on behalf of your group that you lied about the hack (as you previously stated). Once that's done, we will pay the rest of the $50,000 to your account and you can take it all out at once. That should solve your problem."
What is clear from the exchange, if it is legitimate, is that the hackers were eager to negotiate a price to refrain from releasing the stolen source code, regardless of the origin, including setting up an off-shore account through an organization referred to as "Liberty Reserve".
It is also clear that the reasons for threatening to release the source code has little or nothing to do with the original stated purpose YamaTough provided in an Interview with Infosec Island in January.
YamaTough had said the group's intentions were to use the stolen data as a means to gain attention from the press and to undermine the current government of India in an effort to replace them with a more pro-American regime.
Infosec Island had made multiple attempts to prompt YamaTough to provide actual proof that the data had in fact been stolen from servers owned and operated by the Indian government, but all requests were either met with silence or an outright refusal.
“…my team is pro US, we fight for rights in our country we are not intentionally harm US companies (sometimes we do hack into since our botnet is worldwide) but we do not steal credit cards and make money of it and we do not do banks etc. Our mission - exposure of the corruption... We wanna apologize for harm taken by the Symantec USCC and others, but without them being involved things which do occur in our state would never be covered and taken to the public, sometimes you have to sacrifice in order to achieve... and we do not approve sharing personal data and source codes with foreign governments. We want free and nice India and not police state,” YamaTough had previous proclaimed.
Furthermore, YamaTough tweeted that the stolen source code was now available for purchase on the black market: "All the Symantec source codes are now on sale! PcAnywhere, System Works, Internet Security and Norton GoBack with Utilities, NAV".
Of course, it is not surprising that the hordes of Anonymous supporters are attempting to characterize Symantec's effort to protect its intellectual property and millions of customers from exposure as "bribery", but rationally it does not play out that way.
We continue to seek proof that the materials were actually obtained from the Indian government, but at this point have to conclude that the statements were most likely false and that the code was stolen in a 2006 breach of Symantec's company networks as stated.
If YamaTough would like to provide proof of his assertions to the contrary, we still welcome them.